Date: 2007-04-05 07:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bsdotrand.livejournal.com
This is from the linked story about Worms causing Grasshoppers to kill themselves by drowning, so the worm can get out an breed in the water.
Scientists have long argued whether strange behavior in parasite-infested animals is deliberately engineered or simply an accidental side effect of infection.

The odd thing to me is that there's an argument. It seems that there is a perfectly good evolutionary argument for both. Say you have these worms that live in Grasshoppers and have to breed in the water but have no way of "convincing" the grasshopper to jump into the water. That might be a stable existece, as some number of grasshoppers probably end up in the water just by accident. Then say you have two different mutations in different strains of worm. One increases the chance that a grasshopper will be run over by a car and one increases the chance that the grasshopper will drown. It's pretty obvious that the car smushed worm will not survive for long and that the worms that increase the chance of grasshoppers drowning will start to out breed the "normal" worms. Then another mutation would increase the chance of your grasshopper drowning and so on till we're where we are today.

Date: 2007-04-05 07:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bsdotrand.livejournal.com
PS. Sorry for the evolution rantlett. :)

Date: 2007-04-05 09:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] criada.livejournal.com
Hey, I'm all about evolution. :-)

Profile

nonionay: (Default)
nonionay

August 2014

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
1011 1213 141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 28th, 2026 02:43 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios